Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)

From: Jon (fotonerd@yahoo.com)
Date: 12/20/02-09:24:17 PM Z

• Next message: Argon3@aol.com: "re:4X5 development (off topic?)"
• Previous message: Jon: "Don't forget --- Re: Your kidding, right? Re: Tele landscape"
• In reply to: Sandy King: "Re: Your kidding, right? Re: Tele landscape"
• Next in thread: Jack Fulton: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"
• Reply: Jack Fulton: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"
• Maybe reply: Ender100@aol.com: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"
• Reply: Marilyn's Mail: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"
• Maybe reply: Shannon Stoney: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"

> >I also didn't know that a landscape photograph is supposed to show a
> >panoramic vista and what's more, to show proper "photographic"
> >perspective and to represent "reality" accurately. Says who?

Then what is a 'landscape photograph' in your mind?

Doesn't anybody else want to attempt to define it? We all go around
claiming to make 'landscape' images but I have yet to hear anybody clarify
exactly what it means.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

• Next message: Argon3@aol.com: "re:4X5 development (off topic?)"
• Previous message: Jon: "Don't forget --- Re: Your kidding, right? Re: Tele landscape"
• In reply to: Sandy King: "Re: Your kidding, right? Re: Tele landscape"
• Next in thread: Jack Fulton: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"
• Reply: Jack Fulton: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"
• Maybe reply: Ender100@aol.com: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"
• Reply: Marilyn's Mail: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"
• Maybe reply: Shannon Stoney: "Re: Will somebody dare to define it? (landscape)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 01/31/03-09:31:26 AM Z CST