Grafist@aol.com
Date: 02/22/02-04:01:22 PM Z
In a message dated 20/02/02 06:25:25 GMT Standard Time, jseigel@panix.com
writes:
> Well, by my calculations, if the volume of "dichro" was so much greater
> than the paint (a few "squirts"), say about 10 times as much (?), that
> means in effect you had a 20% solution -- wouldn't you say????
>
> And if so, it doesn't count as 2%...
>
> However, you don't say how far from the light source that 15 minutes
> exposure was... Also a factor in actual exposure...
..............................................................................
.........
Judy, You may well be accurate in your calculations. Would anyone like to
comment? The UV radiation exposure source was several million miles away
(?). The Sun. We have not agreed on the volume of a " squirt ". One finds it
difficult to be accurate about these things.
I'll get my coat........... Regards. John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/08/02-09:45:22 AM Z CST