Re: humidifer recommendations?

From: Carl Weese (cweese@earthlink.net)
Date: 03/29/02-08:06:18 PM Z

• Next message: Larry Roohr: "RE: humidifier recommendations?"
• Previous message: Carl Weese: "Re: humidifer recommendations?"
• Maybe in reply to: Matthew Hoffman: "humidifer recommendations?"
• Next in thread: Larry Roohr: "RE: humidifier recommendations?"

Mark,

Depends of course on the process, and then with Pt/Pd (which I'm most
familiar with) it depends on the specific paper, but somewhere between 50%
and 70% Rh is good for most papers. I fine tune it within that range for
various papers.---Carl

--
        web site with picture galleries
        and workshop information at:
        http://home.earthlink.net/~cweese/
----------
>From: Ender100@aol.com
>To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>Subject: Re: humidifer recommendations?
>Date: Fri, Mar 29, 2002, 11:42 AM
>
> Carl,
>
> I'm sorry, this has probably been discussed thousands of times, but what is
> an appropriate level?
> 

• Next message: Larry Roohr: "RE: humidifier recommendations?"
• Previous message: Carl Weese: "Re: humidifer recommendations?"
• Maybe in reply to: Matthew Hoffman: "humidifer recommendations?"
• Next in thread: Larry Roohr: "RE: humidifier recommendations?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 04/10/02-09:28:55 AM Z CST