[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fresson
Pete
Dick,
Yes I was at APIS 97 and Art and I had a bet on whether the traditional
Fresson contained Gum he was going to do some backwards engineering to
determine it one way or the other. As I have had no redress I claim my right
as the winner >grin<
Pete
> Pete,
>
> There were areas that were off limits when I was there. And yes the secret
> is in the paper. I believe you were at APIS 97 in Bath, otherwise known as
> the Sweatlodge, when Art did his presentation on Fresson. I believe art is
> working on the theory of a gum/gelatin mix which is not compatible, thus
> making a fine reticulation in the gelatin which aids in direct development.
>
> --Dick
>
>
> At 06:17 PM 5/2/2002 +0000, you wrote:
>> Pete
>>
>> Argon,
>>
>> No this was a bit of a red herring I have done an in depth study of this
>> process, the secret is in the coating of the paper a secret machine was
>> used. The man that has the real secret apart from the Fresson family is Luis
>> Nadeau who has/had a machine he bought from Jose Ortis Echague. A picture of
>> this machine and Echague operating it can be found in a book published by
>> Gordon Fraser 1979.
>>
>>> Didn't I once read that part of the Fresson Process involved the use of a
>>> sawdust/water slurry to remove the unexposed areas of pigment. Is that the
>>> "secret" that makes the Fresson Print what it is?
>>>
>>> argon
>
>
>
- References:
- Re: fresson
- From: Richard Sullivan <richsul@earthlink.net>