Re: A little gum test

From: Ender100@aol.com
Date: 12/14/03-03:41:57 PM Z
Message-id: <11.1e84ff7f.2d0e3325@aol.com>

Kate and others,

I am trying to remember ealier posts, wasn't there a post that stated that a
more diluted silution of dichromate gave more contrast and thus a lower range
of tones?

Pardon my bad memory.

Mark Nelson
In a message dated 12/14/03 3:28:41 PM, kateb@paradise.net.nz writes:

>
> Hi all, I have just done a little series of tests to look at the difference
> between saturated amm. di. solution and the same solution at 50% strength
> (which I imagine is 15% - but what would I know, I'm no chemist). The results
> were very obvious - the half-strength solution gave a much wider range of tones
> than the full strength with both the Winsor and Newton bottled gum and the
> "generic"gum I mix myself from powder ("borrowed" from the printmaking
> dept). I also threw in a bottled "gum" used by school kids for generations - this
> gave better results with the full strength solution. Interesting! All on Arches
> Aquarelle paper, tray sized with gelatine+ formaldehyde. The "gum"might be
> similar to Gloy but I have no idea what its constituents are - it tastes quite
> organic. Strange to say, I never tasted it when I was a child - how I am
> deteriorating!
>
>  
>
> Kate Mahoney
>
>
Received on Sun Dec 14 15:42:27 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/02/04-09:36:33 AM Z CST