Re: old literatures

There's been absolutely nothing that Ryuji has written in the past month
that I'd interpret as "rudeness". I happen to like his direct and
informative writing style. Who exactly are the "more than a few folks" who
have their "backs up"?

Dave in Wyoming

----- Original Message -----
From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: old literatures

>
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Ryuji Suzuki wrote:
>
> > From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
> > Subject: Re: old literatures
> > Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:12:32 -0500 (EST)
> >
> > > Ryuji, I don't know what you're talking about. I'm not saying anything
> >
> > I thought I was saying somewhat related thing about the bad aspects of
> > blindly believing old literature as a source of today's information
> > with one another example. I'm not saying much more. So I don't know
> > where the misunderstanding came from, though I won't pursue to find it
> > out.
>
> You perhaps have a reading comprehension problem. Or, if you were simply
> free associating on the bottom of my e-mail, you might have indicated same
> -- because there is no connection between my point and your comments,
> except possibly in reverse, which made your dismissive tone even more
> annoying.
>
> Meanwhile, wonderful as it is to have someone on the list who knows more
> than the classic photo encyclopedia, it would have been yet more wonderful
> if you had managed to share your information without the attitude (and
> "attitude" is a euphemism for your.... attitude). Your information all too
> often comes wrapped in an iceball that makes it hard to either appreciate
> or absorb.
>
> Which is to say, your rudeness over the last month has gotten more than a
> few folks' backs up.... and does NOT contribute to the sum total of human
> information -- the purpose of this list.
>
> Judy
Received on Sun Nov 2 20:41:26 2003