--- Kate M <kateb@paradise.net.nz> $B$+$i$N%a%C%;!<%8!'(B
Thanks Judy, Kate, Lisa for this topic and the comments...
.
I often face a similar situation. In my work, each print
is a unique piece, In spite of being printed from the same
orginal negative...
(sort of like a painter who paints the same subject in the
"same way" multiple times...?)
One problem with 1-6 rather than 1/6 method... If someone
is trying to limit your collection, say to increase its
sale (resale) value, just looking at that number gives no
indication that it is in fact a limited edition.
Or is there a solution to this?
Ray
> Lisa, I always call my gum prints unique state,
> simply because even with
> the best timing under artificial light, my prints
> never, just never,
> look exactly the same - this is one of the
> characteristics of gum (I
> have been told). So I will number my prints as 1 of
> 6 rather than 1/6.
> This is in line with a traditional printmaking
> strategy for numbering
> editions of prints that are not exactly the same.
> Cheers
> Kate
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lisa Reddig [mailto:lisa@julianrichards.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 1 July 2004 2:57 a.m.
> To: Alternative
> Subject: Editioning
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a gum editioning question. Please follow me
> through my printing
> process to the query I have....
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/
Received on Thu Jul 1 01:50:27 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 08/13/04-09:01:10 AM Z CST