RE: Kodak Mailers

Yes, I visited the Qualex site and saved the html to PDF for quick
reference, where they list the NJ, LA labs. Apparently you can still get
16mm movie film mailers as well. They suggested that I try B&H. I have a
roll of Kodachrome movie film that needs to be processed. That is another
project for down the line.

Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street
Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Makris [mailto:nick@mcn.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:29 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Kodak Mailers
>
> Eric, earlier Richard K. suggested to contact Kodak (he supplied an 800
> #),
> which I did. After several attempts and persuading someone who wanted my
> account number (which I don't have) that I simply wanted to know if the
> mailers were still honored, I was able to find out they still honor them
> and
> that the address they should be sent to is in NJ
>
> Kodak Processing Lab
> 16-31 Route 208
> Fairlawn NJ 07410
>
> If anyone want's these mailer's let me know.........
>
> n
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Neilsen" <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:54 PM
> Subject: RE: Kodak Mailers
>
>
> > Nick, I just had a terrible experience with a Kodak mailer. I had a
> roll
> > of Kodachrome 200 that I'd had for a while nicely frozen. In a pinch, I
> > decided to use it since I had a mailer kicking around. I had always
> been
> > able to drop them off directly at the lab when I was in the Palo Alto
> area
> > and knew there was a Qualex facility here in Dallas. I drove over to it
> and
> > they would not accept it for shipping to the NJ lab, nor would they give
> me
> > the NJ labs address. I had to go on line to get that. After sending it
> in
> > regular mail I waited, and waited and waited. Finally, I contacted
> Kodak
> > and was told it left their lab on May 4th. It did not show up at my
> studio.
> > Well I had many emails with them to clarify contradictory information
> that
> > I'd been getting over the phone. They put a tracer on it with the US
> Post
> > office and I put one in with my local PO. They finally got it back
> after
> 4
> > weeks marked no such address. I had received bad service from my post
> > office before, but my address has been used by me for almost 5 years,
> and
> by
> > others long before me. Kodak reshipped it in a priority envelop and it
> made
> > it with no problem.
> >
> > I think if I had 9 rolls, I'd send them all at once with a fed ex #. I
> don't
> > plan on restocking any more Kodachrome.
> >
> > Eric Neilsen Photography
> > 4101 Commerce Street
> > Suite 9
> > Dallas, TX 75226
> > http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
> > http://ericneilsenphotography.com
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nick Makris [mailto:nick@mcn.org]
> > > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:45 PM
> > > To: Alt Photo
> > > Subject: Kodak Mailers
> > >
> > > Is anyone knowledgeable about the continued honoring of Kodak slide
> > > mailers???
> > >
> > > I have 9 of the 36 exposure mailers that are quite a few years old.
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any use for them?
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > >
> > > Nick
> >
> >
> >
> >
Received on Mon Jun 14 19:34:59 2004