Re: The Great Scanner debate - round one

Jonathon - Thank you for the 1680 suggestion. Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: <hylandscot@comcast.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: The Great Scanner debate - round one

> Jim,
> For 8x10 negatives, I am using the Epson 1680 with a homemade matboard
collar to place the negative at the proper height above the glass.
Resolution and clarity of the scanned files are great.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jonathon Russell
>
> --
> "Expose for the secrets,
> Develop for the surprises!"
> > Epson's website says 6" x 9" for the 4870. Should be ok with your 5x7
negs.
> > Sadly, I use 8x10. Jim
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John" <ap@darkroompro.com>
> > To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 10:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: The Great Scanner debate - round one
> >
> >
> > At 04:05 PM 3/19/2004 -0500, Sandy wrote:
> > >For 6X6 and 6X9 work the 4870 is better, and it has a larger scanning
> > >areas for negatives and transparencies. Up to 6X9.
> >
> > 4X9 actually. A shame as I shoot 5X7.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 21 11:46:41 2004