RE: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

From: Loris Medici ^lt;loris_medici@mynet.com>
Date: 12/05/05-03:41:59 AM Z
Message-id: <002601c5f980$23c636d0$f402500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

Thanks for the points you mentioned. They will be taken into account.

The list is a wonderful source of information to me. There's no better
way of learning gum by making tests "after" reading the great deal of
information provided in PFPh. + numerous contributions (and websites)
from list members.

You all are great people. Thanks for sharing your experience and
knowledge.

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
Sent: 03 Aralęk 2005 Cumartesi 09:34
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: RE: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

...
I also notice the small -- but important -- details of process this
discussion brought out. 10 years ago there was nothing like it.

J.
Received on Tue Dec 6 18:56:55 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:09 PM Z CST