Katharine et al,
Ohhh, I should qualify my statement below a bit about cadmium red so no one 
takes me at face value and tosses their tube:
Even with doubling its saturation in my mix, the effect of its opacity is 
not a problem in the **print** anywhere and only noticeable in the border as 
a dull final layer.  Thus, I can see why some people might like it just 
fine, but for me there are other reds equally suitable.  However, I was, in 
fact, surprised that it didn't look bad in the print given all the talk 
about opaque pigments not working well for gum.
I was also concerned about cadmium's supposed tendency to darken with time 
or light or whatever, and its toxicity...
Back to former letter:
transparent to semi-transparent to semi-opaque to opaque...and the 
manufacturer's designations are iffy...hmmmm...so where are you drawing the 
line in your own practice between semitransparent and semiopaque or doesn't 
it really matter?
For instance, M Graham PY110 and Maimeri PY139 are the exact color, except 
for a slight opacity to PY139. Exposed, PY139 has a slight dullness in 
comparison to exposed PY110, but  you can still see clearly through it.  It 
is termed "semi-opaque". In gum practice I would call it semi-transparent...
Another thought:  looking at casein prints which I assume have layers of 
milkiness (Sam Wang, chime in here?) that have opacity one on top of one 
another, they look mighty fine.  I wonder what caseinists think?
On the way to the movie store last night I realized that I THINK that partly 
sunny really means mostly cloudy and partly cloudy really means mostly 
sunny.
Chris
> On Dec 20, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Christina Z. Anderson wrote:
>> I realized that a lot of judgments on pigment (opacity, transparency, 
>> color bias, etc.) aren't as critical in gum because you dilute the 
>> pigment in a gum arabic vehicle.
> On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:43 PM, Christina Z. Anderson wrote:
>> I did determine that cadmium red, which I don't use anyway as a general 
>> rule, is not that great.  Its opacity makes for a dull final layer,
>
> Like I said, it's a matter of personal preference, how much attention you 
> pay to fine distinctions in transparency/opacity between pigments.  But 
> the transparent/opaque distinctions I make between pigments are 
> distinctions that I have personally noticed and made use of in gum 
> printing,  so for me at least, the fact that pigments are diluted with gum 
> in gum printing is already taken into account when I make distinctions of 
> transparency/opacity between pigments. But like I've said a million times, 
> I'm not here to impose my preferences on anyone, only to tell you what 
> works for me. Paying attention to this characteristic of pigments works 
> for me.   Peace to All,  and Season's Greetings to All,
> Katharine
>
>
>
> 
Received on Thu Dec 22 10:22:47 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:11 PM Z CST