Re: Re: Author frustration.

From: res1dvao@verizon.net
Date: 01/18/05-10:37:33 AM Z
Message-id: <20050118163733.GEH28362.out005.verizon.net@outgoing.verizon.net>

Lying under oath is a crime. Its called perjury.

George
>
> From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
> Date: 2005/01/16 Sun AM 05:37:29 GMT
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Author frustration.
>
>
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Jim Strain wrote:
>
> > Judy: I was on the list in the early days and do remember. With any luck,
> > we're getting better. On your other point, Matt or Martha, but for her fame,
> > I do not believe she would be in jail. Too bad when her "crime" is lying
> > about something that turned out not to be criminal. Jim
>
> Well, AFAIK sex isn't criminal either, but Clinton got impeached for lying
> about it. Which is to say "crime" is often in the eye of the beholder and
> in the eye of these beholders, Martha is/was an Uppity Woman. A lotta
> famous people, especially in government positions, tell worse lies, but
> being of the male persuasion get away with a tap on the wrist. (Most
> recently the failed nominee for homeland security comes to mind, but more
> get off than not.)
>
> PS. Thanks for remembering the good old-bad old days !
>
> Judy
>
Received on Tue Jan 18 10:37:45 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:08 AM Z CST