Re: ULF photography

From: Judy Seigel ^lt;jseigel@panix.com>
Date: 01/19/05-11:11:39 PM Z
Message-id: <Pine.NEB.4.61.0501200010000.15146@panix2.panix.com>

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Sandy King wrote:
>
> It seems very clear to me. Patrick asked for contributions about ULF
> photography, and I don't think persons who don't even know what the letters
> mean stand to make much of a contribution, so why waste time with an answer
> that contributes nothing. I don't see that as a rude comment, just an honest
> opinion.

Answering the question would have taken exactly 3 words. The put-down was
much longer....so THAt was the waste of time.

J.
Received on Wed Jan 19 23:11:54 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:08 AM Z CST