Christina Z. Anderson wrote:
>
> Well, this is good to hear, as I have made many prints with it. But Wilcox
> was so castigating, saying, "As this is an imitation Gamboge I feel that it
> should be described as such to remove any confusion. It should also employ
> lightfast pigments for the sake of the customer." That, coupled with the
> fact that M. Graham totally reformulated their gamboge to be PY151/PO62 made
> me nervous. Have you talked with M. Graham about why they reformulated?
Yes, but it didn't have anything to do with permanence of the pigment.
kt
Received on Mon Jun 6 09:28:50 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 07/07/05-11:30:54 AM Z CST