Re: Xenon Flashtube was Re: PPG Starphire Glass ( ?? Questioning My Data)

Yes Lori,

I assume everyone would love having a plate burner complete with vaccuum and
light integrator. But if I may ask what kind of price your speaking about
for a BL setup? My photoflood bulb cost me about 7.50 USD and it does the
job and better yet it's a point source.

Regards
Yves

----- Original Message -----
From: "Loris Medici" <loris_medici@mynet.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: Xenon Flashtube was Re: PPG Starphire Glass ( ?? Questioning My
Data)

I personally think a bank of BL tubes is the best choice: it's cheap, it
consumes less energy (cheap by this point of view too), it doesn't get
too hot, it gets on quickly - no need to wait for warming - and you can
turn it on again after a second of turning it off - no need to wait for
cooling -, and the lamps and electronic ballasts are very easy to obtain
(at least for me). I would like a plate-burner just for the vacuum frame
and light integrator.

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Gauvreau [mailto:gauvreau-yves@sympatico.ca]
Sent: 18 Kasım 2005 Cuma 17:56
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Xenon Flashtube was Re: PPG Starphire Glass ( ?? Questioning My
Data)

Hi all,

I see many of you talking about this transmitance problem and about
various UV sources. I know of another UV source, Xenon flashtube and I
wonder why practically no one speek of it as potential source?

16 times the word Xenon was found in the archive and only 7 times the
word UV is used in the same text.

Thanks
Yves
Received on Fri Nov 18 10:22:36 2005