RE: Yupo

From: Loris Medici ^lt;mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: 02/08/06-08:50:30 AM Z
Message-id: <006b01c62cbf$06e93400$f402500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

BTW, I was having fun until just recently, but I started to get bored of
this discussion. Please let me tell you that I won't reply any other
message from you regarding this topic.
 
See you in another topic.
 
Loris.
 
  -----Original Message-----
From: Loris Medici [mailto:mail@loris.medici.name]
Sent: 08 Şubat 2006 Çarşamba 16:39
To: 'alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca'
Subject: RE: Yupo

 
Since both water's surface tension and density is lower than dichromated
gum and whole egg it makes sense to use it for the test.; spraying
possibility is much more compared to dichromated colloids. Well, I
couldn't manage to make the brush spray airborne droplets even with
water... As I said before, it seems that you're much more competent than
me in make that happen; respect! :)
 
Loris.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: TERRYAKING@aol.com [mailto:TERRYAKING@aol.com]
Sent: 08 Şubat 2006 Çarşamba 16:08
To: alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca
Subject: Yupo

Loris
 
I continue to advise against using dichromated mixtures with foam
rollers.
 
How did you assess the validity of your tests ? Why did you use water
rather than the gum mixture which would have been more appropriate ? Did
you try it under differing humidity conditions. How did you measure the
micro droplets ? Did you conduct your tests wearing a mask ? How did you
test for the filtration effects of the mask ? How would you test for the
long term effects of micro droplets of a corrosive liquid on the lungs ?
 
If it happens with paint......
 
Terry
 
Received on Wed Feb 8 08:45:50 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/13/06-10:42:57 AM Z CST