RE: Cyanotype

From: Loris Medici ^lt;mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: 02/16/06-08:33:25 AM Z
Message-id: <006701c63306$0b5db9f0$f402500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

Will try this later with a glass rod (don't have time for the following
two weeks).

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Z. Anderson [mailto:zphoto@montana.net]
Sent: 16 Şubat 2006 Perşembe 16:18
To: Alt List
Subject: Re: Cyanotype

Cool, Michael.
Did you see any graininess or white spots in the 40% coat? What makes
the
40% coat harder to coat?
Is there any way you could post a jpg of the comparison of dmax of the
three? Or do you have a reflection densitometer to measure the
differences?

It seems you are saying that the only benefit to the 20% 2:1 is speed...
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Koch-Schulte" <mkochsch@shaw.ca>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: Cyanotype

>I mixed up the 40% and tried it:
>
> Single coats:
> 40% "A" 1:1 Had best dmax, similar to double coating 20%.1:1 Needs a
> defter
> touch when coating. Definately could cause problems if overcoated. Not
for
> wimps.
> 20% "A" 1:1 Still had a deep blue, not as deep. Same number speed as
> above.
> 20% "A" 2:1 Lightest dmax but acceptable, Faster by about a stop
though.
>
> ~m
Received on Thu Feb 16 08:28:55 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/13/06-10:42:57 AM Z CST