RE: any experience with da vinci brushes

From: Tom Hawkins ^lt;tomehawk@ix.netcom.com>
Date: 02/23/06-11:17:38 AM Z
Message-id: <000501c6389d$0c0da6c0$d200a8c0@tom>

Kerik and Loris,

Thanks very much for your info!

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Kerik [mailto:kerik@kerik.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 9:02 AM
To: alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca
Subject: Re: any experience with da vinci brushes

Hi Tom,

I have a Da Vinci 3". It is similar to the Richeson, but not quite as
nice, IMO. The DaVinci has a thicker pad of bristles, so it tends to soak
up more sensitizer. Also, the handle is very short compared to the
Richeson and I find that a little less comfortable. Plus, you can get a 3"
Magic Brush for $55 from

<http://www.jerrysartarama.com/art-supply/catalogs/0029127000000>

The DaVinci is definitely a close second, though.

Kerik

> Dear Listmembers,
> Does anyone have an opinion on how da Vinci brushes stack up against
> the Richeson 'Magic brush' for coating purposes? My local arts supply
> store is having a 40% off brush sale, and there's a
> 3" da vinci brush whos non-sale price was $74; seems almost too good to
> pass
> up. And you know, if it's expensive, it must be good :).
> Thanks,
> Tom
Received on Thu Feb 23 11:17:51 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/13/06-10:42:58 AM Z CST