Re: any experience with da vinci brushes

From: Kees Brandenburg ^lt;ctb@zeelandnet.nl>
Date: 02/24/06-04:00:35 AM Z
Message-id: <053F14C0-7B89-4E19-9FC2-E52F71D59C63@zeelandnet.nl>

My 60 mm DaVinci 5080 lies here in front of me and on the metal
ferule is embossed: "Edelstahl, Rostfrei". It is attached to the
wooden handle with two 'rivets' on each side. Maybe these are not
stainless? Mine is to new to notice any rust on these rivets or
crackling of the paint. Probably it is a good idea to protect the
rivets by coating them.

http://www.polychrome.nl/images/kwast.jpg

It costed me 16 euro's in the Netherlands.

kees

On 24-feb-2006, at 9:26, Loris Medici wrote:

> Here it says "rust-proof steel ferrules":
> http://www.davinci-defet.com/kuenstler/kat_3_12_engl.html
>
> BTW, an important issue is that the polish on the handles may crack
> with time and when it does so, you may find tiny bits of the red
> paint of the hande on your paper. I guess sanding the damaged
> polish/paint and repainting the handle and/or coating it with a
> strong wood finish would be a good remedy for this particular problem.
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loris Medici [mailto:mail@loris.medici.name]
> Sent: 24 Şubat 2006 Cuma 10:16
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: RE: any experience with da vinci brushes
>
>
> Interesting... My da Vinci brushes are the ones with a black tipped
> red handle (series 5080: http://www.davinci-defet.com/medien/
> massta50.pdf) and never experienced rust with them (I agree that
> rust is a killer for iron processes - have experienced this with
> relatively cheap Pebeo brushes; in the form of dark streaks which
> ruins the print). Some of these have been used since 2003
> (presumably not as often as you do) and never noticed any rust -
> seems like stainless to me. I don't have the brush in front of me
> right now but can't remember any rivet nails (can't see any nails
> in the .pdf too) - usually it's the nails that get rusty (and
> that's for low quality products), not the ferrules...
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ender100@aol.com [mailto:Ender100@aol.com]
> Sent: 23 Şubat 2006 Perşembe 20:10
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: any experience with da vinci brushes
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a Da Vinci brush before I got the Richeson. It was a great
> looking brush and I thought it would work great.... and I think it
> was only $25. I used it a few times and then my PT/PD printing
> started to go bad—I thought at first it had to do with chemistry
> and got fresh FO, etc... then I noticed that there was a streak of
> rust running from both the rivets in the ferrule all the way down
> the bristles to the tips. As a test I used a fresh foam brush and
> found that it wasn't my chemistry. So I tossed the Da Vince and
> ordered a Richeson. The Richeson is really worth it. It has much
> better action than the Da Vinci and absorbs less material. It
> didn't rust either—the rivets in the ferrule were stainless.
>
> But then, that's just my experience. I'll stick with the Richeson.
>
> Mark I. Nelson
> www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
> www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
> PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups
>
> In a message dated 2/23/06 11:02:14 AM, mail@loris.medici.name writes:
>
>
>>
>> I can't say anything about the Richesons since I haven't used
>> them. I have several Da Vinci brushes and they're truly
>> wonderful!!! But even with the 40% price cut, $75 seems high to me
>> - I recently purchased a 3" Da Vinci brush for $19 here in
>> Istanbul... I guess this price difference is due to the high
>> shipment/importation costs to the States (if I'm not wrong, this
>> is a German product).
>> Regards,
>> Loris.
Received on Fri Feb 24 04:00:53 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/13/06-10:42:58 AM Z CST