Re: Mixing argyrotypes

From: Clay ^lt;wcharmon@wt.net>
Date: 03/20/06-08:04:50 AM Z
Message-id: <61F8045A-D445-4F4A-AC04-953A7F163635@wt.net>

Well, as I said, I did Argyrotype for a while and then ditched it
because its fussiness overwhelmed its supposed advantages. FWIW, I
found that it did better with double coating, similar to what works
best for me when doing Van Dyke.

I'm not enough of a chemist to be able to comment intelligently about
his chemical arguments about the archival advantages of Argyrotype.
My 'aw-shucks, I'm just a simple caveman' impression of his arguments
is the same as yours: it is still colloidal silver that ends up in
the paper fibers, and there would seem to be no particular advantage
of one over the other in terms of archival stability.

Clay

> What would be your comments?
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clay [mailto:wcharmon@wt.net]
> Sent: 19 Mart 2006 Pazar 16:07
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Mixing argyrotypes
>
>
> ... according to Mike Ware, has distinctly better archival properties
> than either VDB or salt ...
>
Received on Mon Mar 20 08:18:30 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/10/06-09:43:46 AM Z CST