yes, thanks Bob
tho i'm curious about the other stuff as well, i was wondering in
particular about the studio photography of the 50s for a typical photo
magazine (Europe or U.S.)
i'm wondering if Deardorff was the norm, or if this was more for product
photography. would they be doing things in-house, or would they
typically hire a studio to do the work?
again, any and all specifics would be much appreciated
kris
BOB KISS wrote:
> DEAR LIST,
> Though the discussion of Speed Graphics (I still use one as a field camera)
> and 35 mm has been wonderful, Chris asked about "Studio Cameras" used for
> magazines. If she literally means "studio" then the camera of choice was
> the 8X10. In studio, Life, Look, and most of Conde Nast publications
> (Vogue, etc.) used 8X10s. I also think that the film of choice may have
> been Super XX in the "early 1950s" though I say this under correction.
> CHEERS!
> BOB
>
> Please check my website: http://www.bobkiss.com/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kris [mailto:kris@eq-photo.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 11:05 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: studio cameras circa 1950s
>
> hey all--
> i'm trying to find out info on the types of cameras and films used for
> work in photo magazines in the early 1950s (such as in Life--both in the
> field and in studio).
>
> either specific resources or places to start would be greatly
> appreciated--on or off list.
>
> all the best
> kris
>
>
Received on 05/29/06-07:09:53 AM Z
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 06/23/06-10:10:53 AM Z CST