RE: Hill
I would be really interested in the reference which revealed Hill's Color Dag process to be a fraud. The Daguerrian Society published a papper in which some people claimed to have produced color dags by Hill's process. It included some photos which looked fairly conviencing. I have always been skeptical about the Hill process because I cannot think of a wqay in which the colors could be generated. Also, as I recall, Hill never did give specific directions on how to make color dags. One think I might mention is that if you over expose a Dag you will get a beautiful bright blue in the highlights (see my web page), but there is a physical reason for this. Bob Schramm Check out my web page at: http://www.SchrammStudio.com _________________________________________________________________From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: Hill Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:54:22 -0500 (EST) On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, etienne garbaux wrote:...I also spent some time researching the HillYou speak of Levi Hill? (The name that comes to mind.) More years ago than I can recall I picked up a book at Harvey Zucker's A Photographer's Place with a title something like "Levi Hill Was Right." A group of contemporary photographers DID replicate his effects and even explained why others hadn't been able to and like that. Having no intention myself of EVER doing anything in daguerreotype, and being in fact quite committed to hand coloring, I didn't buy the book, only skimmed it once over lightly. Not that it, too, couldn't have been a fraud, but it had an air of sincerity & fact (also of Hill's frustration & heartbreak for loss of his triumph). Harvey might recollect more. He's still at the same address on Mercer St. I can look it up if need be. but maybe google has something. Communicate instantly! Use your Hotmail address to sign into Windows Live Messenger now. http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
|