U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: the grammar of photographic writers

Re: the grammar of photographic writers



Here is a lovely collection of figures of speech:
http://www.nipissingu.ca/faculty/williams/figofspe.htm
Don Sweet
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Clay Harmon" <wcharmon@wt.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: the grammar of photographic writers


> Don't forget we haven't even gotten to synecdoche yet. Many brains on  
> the list should be able to make short work of it.
> 
> Clay
> On Oct 14, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Judy Seigel wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Don Sweet wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Judy
> >>
> >> The term I would use to describe a construction like "we the  
> >> people" is apposition.  The first word is defined by the other two  
> >> words. Metonymy is use of one word as a symbol for another, eg  
> >> "the War of the Roses" using the emblems of the houses of  
> >> Lancaster and York (red and white roses respectively) to represent  
> >> the rival armies.
> >
> >
> > Oh, I like "apposition"! Excellent....
> >
> > Now just for fun I mention that when I checked the dictionary for  
> > the spelling of "metonymy," it gave two examples, one of them  
> > American -- namely, "the White House" for "president."
> >
> > Well, I thought it was amusing... Anyway, I'm getting to like this  
> > "Oxford American Dictionary," despite its weird typography: It's  
> > portable, hence handier than the unabridged, which requires a  
> > voyage across the room (and has anyway permitted its type to get  
> > too small for human consumption).
> >
> > J.
> >