U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Lightroom (was Re: Adobe Photoshop CS3 update)

Re: Lightroom (was Re: Adobe Photoshop CS3 update)



Ryuki, I agree entirely.

LR allows you to set up presets for processing RAW files for use with files from different cameras (and different conditions/purposing) as well as export presets to write out jpegs in sRGB, Pro Photo RGB or Adobe RGB and to choose file sizes and file types, as well as simplifying the adding of metadata such as keywords, copyright information and captions.

If you shoot RAW you should definitely consider buying it. Nikon users may prefer the Nikon software, which is going to be provided - at last - free with the D3 and D300, and may give better quality conversions, though I think it is considerably less convenient.

Even if you want to continue to use other software for cataloguing your images, LR will in many cases be worth using to input IPTC data so long as your other software can then import this. (If it can't it may not be the best choice in any case.)

I've reviewed most of the well-known and some obscure raw conversion programs in the past and their are others that have some advantages, but LR is the outstanding overall package for overall workflow so far as I'm concerned - and the software I use for virtually all my raw conversions. (Mac users should also consider Aperture.) I still use Photoshop, but mainly for special purposes such as removing image distortion with the PTLens plugin and 'dodging' and 'burning' those images that require this treatment. There are also plugins for noise reduction and sharpening that do a better job than those built in to LR.

LR 1.3 looks a little better organised in some respects. I can only think that the orginal adverse comments must have been based on a very early beta version of the software - which I didn't use. They are certainly not relevant to the current software.

As for screens, you are so right that a good one makes all the difference. My work has improved significantly since I got an Eizo ColorEdge CE210W. Its often hard to find what kind of panel type is used, but I'm told S-IPS are the best.

Regards

Peter

Peter Marshall - Photographer, Writer: NUJ
petermarshall@cix.co.uk +44 (0)1784 456474
31 Budebury Rd, STAINES, Middx, TW18 2AZ, UK
_________________________________________________________________
Re:PHOTO                     http://re-photo.co.uk
My London Diary http://mylondondiary.co.uk/
London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/
The Buildings of London etc: http://londonphotographs.co.uk/
and elsewhere......


Ryuji Suzuki wrote:
From: Eric Neilsen <ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: RE: Adobe Photoshop CS3 update
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:02:48 -0600


For those that have not bought LR, Don't!
Many here are not simply sRGB type users where we are
processing RAW file for quick use, but rather processing RAW
and using them in a large format way. LR is not designed for
fine art, but quick use as a RAW to Web/Lab output. From
what I gather, it has great failing in digital asset
management ( the ability to log and track your files).
Why do you say that? I can seem to work with Lightroom and
color space other than sRGB... I'm using one of the PVA panels
(not those cheap TN panels--there really is a difference) with
wide-gamut backlight, and I really see the difference.

I don't think anyone thinks Lightroom is a Photoshop
replacement; people use them together. It's just a way to
organize images and apply "RAW processing" to the
file. Indeed, people frequently edit images using PS from
within LR and keep the original and edit copy together.

What I wish Adobe did to LR is to add functions oriented to
image files from film scanning. This includes photomerge
automation in 16-bit color within Lightroom.

--
Ryuji Suzuki
http://silvergrain.org