Re: Gum calibration (was: Paper negatives- Ink Selection)
Yes. If that color is accurate, I would say that my exposed-non-developed prints are, 1) browner than this, and 2) not as much detail can be observed on mine. Very interesting. You've got the entire image visible in an un-developed picture. 2008/10/17 Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>: > BTW, see the just exposed yellow layer of the same image (on Fabriano): > > http://tinyurl.com/58zoxu > > Anything unusual to your eyes? > > Thanks, > Loris. > > > 17 Ekim 2008, Cuma, 10:16 pm tarihinde, Loris Medici yazmış: >> Hi Keith, >> >> You can't tell by just looking - what counts is what the coating sees in >> wavelengths it's sensitive to. Unfortunately, it can only help to see the >> tonal distribution... Perhaps your inks are denser than mines in the UV >> region, printed using the Tyvek paper profile. Have you tried plain paper >> profile? Maybe it lays less ink compared to Tyvek? >> >> Regards, >> Loris. >> >> >> 17 Ekim 2008, Cuma, 10:00 pm tarihinde, Keith Gerling yazmış: >>> It helps. The negatives are pretty dense. When you started to talk >>> about negative density I was getting concerned. The only Pictorico >>> negatives I've actually held in my hand were some made by Sandy King >>> and I was astonished that he was able to get such a range of tones >>> from something that looked so "thin". Your paper negs don't look any >>> different from mine. > >
|