RE: GAYLORD was STORAGE OF 17X22 INKPRESS NEGS?
DEAR PAUL, Please note that my negs (as shown in the subject box) are 17X22 inches and the largest version of 2914CP is 16 inches wide. Won't do the job. Any other suggestions at Gaylord??? CHEERS! BOB -----Original Message----- From: Paul Viapiano [mailto:viapiano@pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 12:04 PM To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: Re: GAYLORD was STORAGE OF 17X22 INKPRESS NEGS? Bob... The covers I purchased are in a continuous roll form. Enter part 2914CP in the search box...these are also great for thier intended use ;-). In the 14" size they cover most hardbound art and photography books, and are folded down to cover smaller ones. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@caribsurf.com> To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:42 AM Subject: GAYLORD was STORAGE OF 17X22 INKPRESS NEGS? > DEAR JUDY & PAUL, > I found Gaylord's site and it is ENORMOUS. I entered "Book Sleeves" > in their site search and, though there was a LONG list of things, none of > them were book sleeves. Can you give me more specific directions as to > where to find them on this site? > CHEERS! > BOB > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Viapiano [mailto:viapiano@pacbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:51 AM > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca > Subject: Re: STORAGE OF 17X22 INKPRESS NEGS? > > Yep, Gaylord is still there, bigger than ever... > > I just recv'd an order of book covers a month or two ago, and was looking > at > > their catalog just the other day... > > Paul > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com> > To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca> > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:09 PM > Subject: RE: STORAGE OF 17X22 INKPRESS NEGS? > > >> >> For what it's worth I mention that I use archival transparent "book >> sleeves" (which come in many sizes, from Gaylord) for negative storage -- >> because, instead of an envelope that you have to pull the negative out >> of, > >> possibly/probably scratching it (more of a risk with film negs than >> digital, of course, but still not a good idea IME) you just lift the >> flap. > >> The 2nd side isn't as wide as the first, but by stacking with the full >> sheet over the emulsion side of the neg, it works. >> >> Each neg gets its own sleeve, which, tho certainly more expensive than a >> whole bunch in one clear envelope, is very handy and cheap enough. (Tho, >> come to think of it, is Gaylord still there?) >> >> Also, you can write the title or description of each image on the sleeve, >> and store in alphabetical order... (very convenient for reprinting, tho >> maybe not everyone does that?) >> >> J. >> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature > database 3864 (20090218) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3865 (20090218) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
|