gum question

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: gum question
From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:26:07 -0700
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <B861914D-24FF-4F0E-BC4A-F54EAF94B9E7@mac.com><D9EEF2C2F0F245C7A92611475255F8EB@VALUED20606295><010b01c9a2ba$3d7e1660$0201a8c0@east><20090313.024115.29567203.lifebook-4234377@silvergrain.org><5EF3ECAB7F954493A9B765D0722B314F@DC5YX7B1>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Is there any big difference btw the different gums...? (performance-wise, that is...)

I mean, for starting out, can I just get some of the B&S stuff, or is there a huge reason I should get the Daniel Smith?

Curious...

Paul

----- Original Message ----- From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: Overpriced Underpants

And I just received my gallon of Daniel Smith gum that only cost me about $6 a pint and I feel really good about that, too!
Chris

Follow-Ups:
- RE: gum question
  - From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>
- Re: gum question
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>

References:
- Re: Overpriced Underpants
  - From: Christoph Hammann <chammann@mac.com>
- Re: Overpriced Underpants
  - From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Overpriced Underpants
  - From: Don Sweet <don@sweetlegal.co.nz>
- Re: Overpriced Underpants
  - From: Ryuji Suzuki <rs@silvergrain.org>
- Re: Overpriced Underpants
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>