Re: muddy gum print--help?

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: muddy gum print--help?
From: Charles Ryberg <cryberg@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:57:04 -0700
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <770d34170904141452m60727724hfadd3de40b687e17@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <28224.62.244.225.182.1239257011.squirrel@loris.medici.name><C583EB3C4B894FBD94319F8BD218F7CE@DC5YX7B1><64800.62.244.225.182.1239287159.squirrel@loris.medici.name><F8C348BD-744D-4264-871A-892B4AE629DB@wt.net><A2BB9987F10C44CE8E2C41650AC24184@hpPC><770d34170904122135n67fac98cx93080f8da3a15fd8@mail.gmail.com><C445258E-4D2F-4CA9-8355-3C07A1B82D8F@pacifier.com><127A7B44AB5E4260A4F9EAE2A6EAE583@hpPC><770d34170904141452m60727724hfadd3de40b687e17@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Jim:
Sorry about the confusion. I'm using standard liquid gum. The 50/50 water mix was determined empirically to be thick enough to coat and thin enough to measure with reasonable repeatability in an eyedropper. It is possible that I could or should use a thicker gum, but this coats evenly. Charles Portland Oregon

Follow-Ups:
- Re: muddy gum print--help?
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>

References:
- green-yellow
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
- Re: green-yellow
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- Re: green-yellow
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
- Re: green-yellow
  - From: Clay <wcharmon@wt.net>
- muddy gum print--help?
  - From: Charles Ryberg <cryberg@comcast.net>
- Re: muddy gum print--help?
  - From: Jim Larimer <jrlarimer@gmail.com>
- Re: muddy gum print--help?
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
- Re: muddy gum print--help?
  - From: Charles Ryberg <cryberg@comcast.net>
- Re: muddy gum print--help?
  - From: Jim Larimer <jrlarimer@gmail.com>