Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:14:05 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999 User659199@aol.com wrote:
> As you say D max doesn't seem to be the problem - but waxed paper couldn't be
> a quit satisfying solution.
Granted I'm a peasant gum printer, not a noble platinum-ite, but in my
tests a waxed paper negative was consistently better than one printed on
acetate or any of the film-type sheets sold for digital printers. In fact
if it were properly waxed (a cinch with the Epson, trickier with laser
toner) I could find nothing at all wrong with it. I'm wondering if the
fault is something I've missed, if it's just a feeling, or apparent in
some media, & not others... or possibly some other eye than mine ...?
I mention again in passing that the paper neg is faster, presumably
because it doesn't inhibit UV as does plastic.
Judy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:30