Re: Permanency of VDB (test)

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
• From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <F350Gh331DPrZjuy0Rh000005dd@hotmail.com>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Robert W. Schramm wrote:
> 
> At the workshop we were shown slides of photoarchives in Europe where
> rows and rows of freezers held photographic images.
> 
> I do agree with you last comment. After all, what good is art is
> nobody gets to see it; however, since photography is printmaking,


Well, something else comes to mind -- generating the electricity to run
those rows and rows of freezers probably contributes to the pollution and
global warming that is part of the problem in the first place...

Just something about that, even if the total effect is miniscule, bothers
me.

Judy

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
    • From: Gregory Parkinson <glp@panix.com>

• References:
  • Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
    • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
• Next by Date: Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
• Prev by thread: Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
• Next by thread: Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread