Re: Censorship issues

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Censorship issues
• From: Gary Miller <gmphotos@earthlink.net>
• Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:02:54 -0700
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <B6189DA1.1232%jefulton1@home.com>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022

Just remember Jack that the FBI didn't come down hard on Sturges because a
black man delivered his slide to the lab.  The charged him with child
pornography and would have done the same thing sooner or later even if Jock
brought his slides to the lab.  As far as Mapplethorpe, there again he was
probably attacked more because of his sexual orientation and S&M pictures,
laced with a bit of child pornography and pornography second.  I agree that
there can very often be racist overtones used with other labels, but in the
general arena the larger issues usually surface.

Gary Miller

• References:
  • Re: Censorship issues
    • From: Jack Fulton <jefulton1@home.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: AN EDUCATION IN REALITY?
• Next by Date: Re: AN EDUCATION IN REALITY?
• Prev by thread: Re: Censorship issues
• Next by thread: Re: Censorship issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread