Re: Re: pt/pd desktop negatives

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Date: 05/27/01-08:09:49 PM Z


On Sun, 27 May 2001 Smieglitz@aol.com wrote:
> The ink (Cone Tech Piezography BW) appears to dry within a few minutes.
> Being carbon pigment-based it appears to sit on the surface of the Pictorico
> transparency material as a fine powder deposit although some of it obviously
> sinks into the coating of the transparency since I can rub off the surface
> deposit and still have an image beneath. I apply the acrylic spray after
> letting the printed image sit for about a half hour. It doesn't run or
> degrade the deposit as far as I can tell, but I haven't had the chance yet to
> see if it affects the printing characteristics (i.e., UV transmission). It
> causes the image to adhere and makes it quite resistant to scratching, so I
> guess the answer to your question is yes on both counts.

Joe, what size pictorico are you using? Has it been made available larger
than 11 by 17 yet ???? I know that Adorama sells the 11x17 ... any other
ideas?

My experience with acrylic spray, incidentally, leads me to suspect that
it could impair the inkjet if applied BEFORE printing -- it tends to make
some kind of stipple (though I suppose possible to avoid).

Judy

>
> I don't know what effect it would have if sprayed before being printed, but
> it would give the acetate a fine tooth that perhaps the ink would adhere to.
> I'm not getting any ink pooling, bleeding or other problems I've experienced
> with other transparency brands when I use the Pictorico OHP material, so
> those problems have been eliminated with the setup I am using. The remaining
> problem would seem to be building up enough ink density for processes like
> VDB, Pt/Pl, cyanotype, etc.
>
> Joe
>


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 07/12/01-11:29:40 AM Z CST