RE: Stain in Pt./Pd. printing, was Re: price of pt/pd printing

From: Loris Medici ^lt;loris_medici@mynet.com>
Date: 04/13/05-11:51:26 AM Z
Message-id: <003d01c54051$6a9fbfb0$ce02500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

Hi Cristina, happy for you. But, doesn't this mean that you don't have
"true whites" in your image area? (I mean: if you're using colorize
method for the rest of the negative) I guess it's very slight and
doesn't bother you.

Regards,
Loris.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christina Z. Anderson [mailto:zphoto@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 8:40 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Stain in Pt./Pd. printing, was Re: price of
> pt/pd printing
>
> ...So this morning I did a test: not having
> ruby lith on
> hand, I put a black ink border in Photoshop around each neg.
> In one neg I
> left part of a color ink only border on one side, with a
> black border around
> that. Sure enough, where the black border is, no stain,
> where the color
> border is, slight stain, which I guess should now really be
> called exposure.
> The black held back all light so no exposure occurred. Clean, white
> borders.
> ...
Received on Wed Apr 13 11:49:47 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/13/05-09:23:11 AM Z CST