Re: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

From: Katharine Thayer ^lt;kthayer@pacifier.com>
Date: 12/01/05-10:34:39 AM Z
Message-id: <5E698E4A-6288-11DA-94C8-001124D9AC0A@pacifier.com>

On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:19 AM, Christina Z. Anderson wrote:

>
> If my digitally challenged husband could say to me, "Wow, Chris,
> that's the best print you've done yet" (of my "Squish" series--the
> cars), if he could even NOTICE that it was the best one, it works for
> me!

That's a great print, BTW. If you continue to get prints like that
reliably, that would be a fairly compelling argument for your method.
Katharine
Received on Thu Dec 1 10:35:24 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:09 PM Z CST