Re: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

From: Katharine Thayer ^lt;kthayer@pacifier.com>
Date: 12/01/05-10:51:02 AM Z
Message-id: <A82D1508-628A-11DA-94C8-001124D9AC0A@pacifier.com>

On Dec 1, 2005, at 8:34 AM, Katharine Thayer wrote:

>
> On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:19 AM, Christina Z. Anderson wrote:
>
>>
>> If my digitally challenged husband could say to me, "Wow, Chris,
>> that's the best print you've done yet" (of my "Squish" series--the
>> cars), if he could even NOTICE that it was the best one, it works for
>> me!
>
> That's a great print, BTW. If you continue to get prints like that
> reliably, that would be a fairly compelling argument for your method.

And is yet another example of the many different ways there are to get
great results in gum.
kt
Received on Thu Dec 1 10:52:02 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:09 PM Z CST