Hi John,
Yes, paper negatives work well with commercial silver paper, but if
you tried to print that same RC paper negative onto gum, you'd be
exposing all day. (Unless maybe you did it in the sun, but still I
think enough heat might build up under that slab of pastic that is the
backing on RC paper that you'd probably cook the emulsion). At any
rate, oiling isn't going to work with an RC paper negative, because the
backing is plastic, not paper, and won't take to oil. Some people (Jack
Fulton, I think) have had good luck peeling the emulsion off RC paper
and throwing away the back, but I never have been able to make that
work for me.
Katharine
I've oiled both digital and fibre-based paper negatives.
On Dec 13, 2005, at 2:07 AM, Grafist@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hi Gang, Several years back, using a camera made from a cardboard
> box and a simple double meniscus lens ( two 1 dioptre i.e. 2 X 1000mm
> ) which equals a lens of 500mm I exposed a sheet of Resin Coated
> Ilford Multigrade 10 X 8 for five seconds to make a negative by
> normal development in PQ. Without oiling the paper it was contacted
> with a similar sheet and exposed for something like 30 secs. and
> developed in PQ developer. People who have seen this kind of print
> could not believe how it was made because there is virtually no
> apparent grain and the tonal range is excellent.
>
> The C/B camera was positioned on the roof of my car
> and held steady by the weight of a house brick. The shutter was a
> strip of black carpet tape stuck over the aperture( a piece of
> cardboard with a pencil hole in it)
> .
> What would be the advantage in oiling paper
> negs?......decreased exposure time of the print?? Decreased
> grain??.... The great advantage of using paper negs, as Mr. King
> mentions, is the decreased cost of negative material as opposed to
> film.
>
> Wishing you all happy photo days during the Christmas and New
> Year break....and beyond.
> As that great philosopher has said many times. ''Keep it
> simple''
> John Grocott - Photographist
>
Received on Tue Dec 13 16:17:51 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:10 PM Z CST