Re: Rethinking pigment stain

You're no doubt correct, but be that as it may, the point was that fog
and pigment stain aren't easy to distinguish, if the definition of
pigment stain is pigment that adheres to paper where it doesn't belong,
rather than pigment that is impossible to remove from paper, even if I
think the broader definitiion is more useful. But I agree with Dave
that fog in gum isn't that common, so perhaps it's a moot point.
kt

On Dec 13, 2005, at 7:09 PM, Ender100@aol.com wrote:

> Hi Katherine,
>
> I think you might be referring to a comment I made where I was
> suggesting that in that particular case you are talking about it
> seemed to be stain, but that there was also the possibility in other
> cases that one could have Stain or fog or both that leave pigment
> where it shouldn't be.
>
>
> Best Wishes,
> Mark Nelson
> Precision Digital Negatives
> PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups
> www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
>
> In a message dated 12/13/05 1:30:43 PM, kthayer@pacifier.com writes:
>
>
>
> One problem with this more inclusive definition is that it doesn't
> distinguish between stain and fog.  Someone referred recently to a
> discussion from last summer where Mark showed a gum test print where
> there was color on areas where the print should have been paper
> white. 
> I called that stain, and was told that it was fog.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Dec 13 21:29:39 2005