February 2006 Alt-Photo-Process-L: RE: Cyanotype

From: Loris Medici ^lt;mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: 02/16/06-09:35:06 AM Z
Message-id: <007201c6330e$a6b9f000$f402500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

I think it's rude and arrogant to imply someone's results are inferior
(especially when done without seeing the actual tests/prints!) just
because they use a different method and don't follow your dogma. Also,
"good picture" can be a very subjective concept. Do you wonder why I
asked so much and so detailed questions about Cyanotype-Rex?

-----Original Message-----
From: TERRYAKING@aol.com [mailto:TERRYAKING@aol.com]
Sent: 16 Şubat 2006 Perşembe 16:56
To: alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Cyanotype

...

But then if a good picture is not your objective there are lots and lots
and lots of variations you can try.
Received on Thu Feb 16 09:30:43 2006