Jack et all,
the idea was to make a (fine) negatives(1) for alt process in general and I
should have said 16"x20" instead of 8x10.
Basically, I think we have two choice, either we make our own negative on a
printer(2) which imply the cost of the printer, the numbers of negative it
can do, the cost of inks and the cost of material used as film or have it
done by someone else. I just wanted to have an idea of what method and/or
device to use considering quality and cost.
Thanks,
Yves
(1) All edits are done on the computer file => no dodging or burning
(2) Or some other device capable of using a computer file as input
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Fulton" <jefulton1@comcast.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Digital negatives???
> Depends upon what you wish to do with it.
> If you want to work on platinum/palladium, cyano, VDB, that will use
> UV light so you will
> require the Pictorico product. IOf you merely wish to make a fine neg
> (all dodged, burned and finished)
> for a standard silver-gelatin print, then you can use the Epson
> backlit (or other brand) material to print
> on as it blocks UV light and an enlarger made print does not get
> affected by that lack.
> Jack Fulton
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Yves Gauvreau wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to know if anyone knows an as cheap as possible but a
> > repeatable,
> > and precise way of producing a large negative (8x10 or more) from a
> > digital
> > file???
> >
> > Thanks
> > Yves
> >
>
Received on Thu Jan 5 16:48:47 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/14/06-10:55:38 AM Z CST