RE: toning "lumen" prints

From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:50:11 +0000
Message-id: <BAY101-F297B4B26EB2B14C7079E8CBB800@phx.gbl>

Chris,
Good to hear from you again. Lumen prints tone very well. You tone after
exposure, before fixing. Toning is very much dependent on the paper that you
use. Warm tone forte paper tone beautifully in gold or platinum toner
preserving a lot of delicate color hues that arise during long exposures.
See some examples
http://www.alternativephotography.com/artists/marek_matusz.html
Marek, Houston

>From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>To: "Alt, List" <alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca>
>Subject: toning "lumen" prints
>Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:11:56 -0600
>
>Good evening all,
>Can't seem to shake "China time"--up late at night, sleep til noon in the
>morning...hmmmm.
>
>I slugged through 140pp of notes from time immemorial, and came across a
>statement by a very reputable black and white source who said that when a
>print exposed in the sun as per Burchfield's lumen prints (intense, long
>sun exposure, no development, just fixing, as per our discussion back in
>sept. or oct.) the silver halide is reduced to elemental silver, which does
>not tone.
>
>However, I have also in my notes from either Liam Lawless, Kees or someone
>on this list from years ago (2000?) that toning works great with POP paper
>(not traditional POP but POP you create from normal enlarging paper). I am
>way too lazy to take my print into the school's darkroom at the moment and
>see if it tones--anyone doing lumen prints lately can help me out here? I
>tend to believe Liam/Kees' statement...
>Chris
>
>
Received on 06/17/06-10:50:26 AM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 07/28/06-08:55:13 AM Z CST