Re: SPE and alt update

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: SPE and alt update
From: Jon Lybrook <jon@terabear.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 04:35:58 -0600
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <002201c896e6$b60981e0$6b5e4854@MUMBOSATO>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <005a01c89469$4c77dda0$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1><045701c8947f$7d7c6180$78752480$@net><2de1e7ed0804030852k73126911h3cf688fa200093f8@mail.gmail.com><25F41AA7-4F7D-4EDF-8D49-B4DA3294580A@aol.com><008f01c8960b$921ba0f0$2a594854@MUMBOSATO><2de1e7ed0804040802k7f2842cfl1876bb89719427ce@mail.gmail.com><002201c896e6$b60981e0$6b5e4854@MUMBOSATO>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)


martinm wrote:

Agreed. Speaking of non-toxicity in the case of these photopolymers is
simply a bit of an overstatement. As long as they're not polymerized (by
light or heat exposure), they're highly reactive ...

Thanks Martin,

I'm not a chemist.  What does reactive mean in this context?

Regards,
Jon

--
Jon Lybrook
Tera Bear Consulting
http://terabear.com
303-818-5187

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: martinm <martinm@gawab.com>

References:
- SPE and alt update
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- RE: SPE and alt update
  - From: Richard Sullivan <richsul@earthlink.net>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: SusanV <susanvoss3@gmail.com>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: Mark Nelson <ender100@aol.com>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: martinm <martinm@gawab.com>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: SusanV <susanvoss3@gmail.com>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: martinm <martinm@gawab.com>