Hi Judy, I was making tests for tricolor gum. I'm trying to find the
right amnt. of pigment, gum and dichromate + strength of dichromate:
The pigment (tube) is Schmincke Cerulean blue tone (PW 4 + PB15:3) -
Yes, I know it contains zinc-oxide. I first poured the whole tube in a
film canister, then I added gum arabic (stirring, until the canister was
completely full) making a pigment stock solution. Later, I diluted this
stock solution 1:2 with gum arabic, then I added to this equal amnt. of
5% ammonium dichromate. I exposed it for 6 minutes. Developed face down
in still water (changing it every 10 minutes) for about 1 hour.
I got 16 clearly defined steps with the 31-step tablet. This makes 0.1 x
16 = log 1.6 negative density range. When you translate this into
21-step tablet (every steps are 0.15) it makes 1.6 / 0.15 ~= 11 steps.
And the max print density was slightly less than single coated classic
cyanotype (quite acceptable).
Does this makes me clever, experienced? ;) I don't think so, I guess it
makes me very very lucky. :)
BTW, what I trying to achieve is to standardize my pigment + gum +
dichromate emulsion mixes and exposure time for each color, so that they
all give me the same number of steps. Only after managing this I will
start to build curves and attempt to make tricolors. (Not that I feel an
urge to do tricolor gums - just for its fun...) What do you think about
this strategy?
Regards,
Loris.
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
Sent: 01 Aralık 2005 Perşembe 07:19
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)
> I really got 8 STEPS not STOPS and I don't understand what
> could be the magic about that?
Because 6 or 7 steps is all an experienced gum printer would get in one
coat, but most likely in pale tones (which are much easier to get more
steps with because the darks don't block up). Getting them with enough
depth to be a full picture, without requiring several coats on top of
one
another to build up the tone, is, again, a sign of expertise.
And yes, I speak of steps.
Received on Thu Dec 1 02:30:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:09 PM Z CST