Re: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

From: Katharine Thayer ^lt;kthayer@pacifier.com>
Date: 12/01/05-09:36:03 AM Z
Message-id: <2EA4C580-6280-11DA-94C8-001124D9AC0A@pacifier.com>

On Dec 1, 2005, at 12:34 AM, Loris Medici wrote:

>
> Hi Judy, I was making tests for tricolor gum. I'm trying to find the
> right amnt. of pigment, gum and dichromate + strength of dichromate:
>
> The pigment (tube) is Schmincke Cerulean blue tone (PW 4 + PB15:3)

This seems to me a rather convoluted way to print with pthalo, but
whatever works for you....

I didn't see Judy's original post quoted below. I would agree with her
that it would be remarkable to see a one-coat made with very dark heavy
pigment that printed 8 steps, But I would disagree with her statement
that experienced printers can't expect more than 6 or 7 steps even with
a lighter pigment/mix; I routinely print 8 to 10 steps when I'm
printing the midtones-highlights layer of a (monochrome) image, or one
of the layers of a tricolor. But Judy and Loris, I think, are talking
apples and oranges. Judy's talking about a one-coat gum that is
printed with a very dark-valued pigment; Loris is talking about
tricolor, where the darkest values are created by overlaying three
layers, none of which are as dark as the darkest tones in the combined
image.

Katharine

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
> Sent: 01 Aralık 2005 Perşembe 07:19
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)
>
>
>> I really got 8 STEPS not STOPS and I don't understand what
>> could be the magic about that?
>
> Because 6 or 7 steps is all an experienced gum printer would get in one
> coat, but most likely in pale tones (which are much easier to get more
> steps with because the darks don't block up). Getting them with enough
> depth to be a full picture, without requiring several coats on top of
> one
> another to build up the tone, is, again, a sign of expertise.
Received on Thu Dec 1 09:37:15 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:09 PM Z CST