I sure would like to see a Kodachrome approach in digital, in which the
image is recorded on three layers (or some digital equivalent) in red,
green, and blue. Right now, so far as I know, they only record an
average single pixel, which in turn causes blue/purple in the areas of
transition from backlit.
Pam
Judy Seigel wrote:
> Being a digital camera retard (albeit not going back to film EVER), I
> hesitate to even mention this -- but perhaps some enlightening
> comments will ensue..
>
> In this past Thursday's column in the Times, David Pogue, who had just
> been to the digital camera expo, commented to the effect that the race
> to pixel heights is over, because the cameras at circa 8 mp are
> everywhere and/or great, or something like that.
>
> I myself am intrigued by word of a Kodak with 2 lenses (my largest
> beef with the Canon-from-hell being that the framing is too
> un-widefocus, that is, after the buttons all over the thing that go
> off everytime I pick it up).
>
> It would be nice to have a camera that doesn't try to do every funny
> trick, or chirp like a bird or woof like a dog when you hit the wrong
> button, but Of course I realize that the nikon cited, among others, is
> another order of being... Or is it still?
>
> PS: Also in the NY Times Business Section, either Friday or Saturday,
> an interesting article about 3rd party inkjet refills -- at Walgreen
> and Home Depot (I think it was) among other places.
>
> Judy
>
>
Received on Sun Feb 5 16:24:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/13/06-10:42:57 AM Z CST